<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Awards Page Dropped From Google Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation and Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:42:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: böcek ilaçlama</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>böcek ilaçlama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>This is a great reminder that we can only control ourselves, not others. So, while someone may give us harsh negative feedback, we still have the ability to be graceful in our response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great reminder that we can only control ourselves, not others. So, while someone may give us harsh negative feedback, we still have the ability to be graceful in our response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adda4u</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>adda4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>How can we know that Google penalizes ...

I would like to know more abt it ...

Any one?

-sri-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we know that Google penalizes &#8230;</p>
<p>I would like to know more abt it &#8230;</p>
<p>Any one?</p>
<p>-sri-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vagrant</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>vagrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s probably why SMF forums have problems then when their boards end in things like /index.php?board=17.0

*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s probably why SMF forums have problems then when their boards end in things like /index.php?board=17.0</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, I didn&#039;t actually think that a person had done something, but reading the post it does come off a bit like that. I will try to make a few amendments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, I didn&#8217;t actually think that a person had done something, but reading the post it does come off a bit like that. I will try to make a few amendments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t jump to the conclusion that we&#039;re penalizing SEOmoz, because we weren&#039;t. I just did a post about this issue: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dont-end-your-urls-with-exe/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t jump to the conclusion that we&#8217;re penalizing SEOmoz, because we weren&#8217;t. I just did a post about this issue: <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dont-end-your-urls-with-exe/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dont-end-your-urls-with-exe/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Chef</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the Guardian fails completely. Read the Times instead for SEO advice:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article3866889.ece

If this is a penalty not a mistake Google REALLY sucks. I can see it rank #1 for Web 2.0 awards but not in the Google cache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the Guardian fails completely. Read the Times instead for SEO advice:<br />
<a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article3866889.ece" rel="nofollow">http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article3866889.ece</a></p>
<p>If this is a penalty not a mistake Google REALLY sucks. I can see it rank #1 for Web 2.0 awards but not in the Google cache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>hmm...this is an interesting post..It first time for me to read it or hear about it..^^ anyways thanks for sharing the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230;this is an interesting post..It first time for me to read it or hear about it..^^ anyways thanks for sharing the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>Looks like 2006, 2007 pages didn&#039;t get the smack down and are still ranking for web 2.0 awards 2006/2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like 2006, 2007 pages didn&#8217;t get the smack down and are still ranking for web 2.0 awards 2006/2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short is a PR 6 which is the page google lists in the SERPs.

www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short is unranked.  

I do not think Google penalized anyone, I think you may have just been looking at the wrong page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short</a> is a PR 6 which is the page google lists in the SERPs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/short</a> is unranked.  </p>
<p>I do not think Google penalized anyone, I think you may have just been looking at the wrong page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Tuknov</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/web-20-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Tuknov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/seomoz-penailised-by-google-for-web-20-awards/#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>You, see it&#039;s not a Google&#039;s fault that that site is not ranking well. Web 2.0 is too general term, and i believe the sites that are ranking at this moment could be even better web 2.0 resources then the site you are mentioning. If you type web 2.0 award or web 2.0 awards then you can see the site you are looking for. Google is really good search engine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You, see it&#8217;s not a Google&#8217;s fault that that site is not ranking well. Web 2.0 is too general term, and i believe the sites that are ranking at this moment could be even better web 2.0 resources then the site you are mentioning. If you type web 2.0 award or web 2.0 awards then you can see the site you are looking for. Google is really good search engine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
