<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Gets 1st Page Ranking on Google For Porn Thanks to New Algo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation and Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Links of london</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator>Links of london</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-7549</guid>
		<description>this makes sense for SE&#039;s to do, because it allows more recent/relevant pages to sneak into the first page which probably provides a better user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this makes sense for SE&#8217;s to do, because it allows more recent/relevant pages to sneak into the first page which probably provides a better user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ?Google se Acerca a Resultados en Tiempo Real?</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>?Google se Acerca a Resultados en Tiempo Real?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>[...] un artÃ­culo reciente, Dave Eaves explorÃ³ algunos resultados muy intrigantes en los que un blogger, logro posicionarse en la primera [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un artÃ­culo reciente, Dave Eaves explorÃ³ algunos resultados muy intrigantes en los que un blogger, logro posicionarse en la primera [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Approaching Real-Time Search Results? &#124; SEO Scoop</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Approaching Real-Time Search Results? &#124; SEO Scoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent article at The SEO Company, Dave Eaves explored some intriguing results where a blogger managed to get onto the first page of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent article at The SEO Company, Dave Eaves explored some intriguing results where a blogger managed to get onto the first page of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5074</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5074</guid>
		<description>@giedrius he was ranking for the phrase without safe search enabled I think. I haven&#039;t enabled any safe search as far as I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@giedrius he was ranking for the phrase without safe search enabled I think. I haven&#8217;t enabled any safe search as far as I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5073</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5073</guid>
		<description>@Jaan Kanellis I agree with you, but it is certainly a new breed of freshness boost, the likes of which have never been seen before, porn? search engine optimization? No blog post has ever been on the 1st page for phrases as competitive as that, for the last 3 years anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jaan Kanellis I agree with you, but it is certainly a new breed of freshness boost, the likes of which have never been seen before, porn? search engine optimization? No blog post has ever been on the 1st page for phrases as competitive as that, for the last 3 years anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5072</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5072</guid>
		<description>Yup nothing more than a freshness boost for his blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup nothing more than a freshness boost for his blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5070</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5070</guid>
		<description>I think Google is just trying to make some necessary changes to really clean up search results a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is just trying to make some necessary changes to really clean up search results a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>I think what&#039;s going on is more of a &quot;honeymoon period&quot; where Google ranks new pages/posts high for a short period (possibly based off of how much traffic, clicks, or new links the page is getting) to see if the result is more relevant than current page 1 results.  I&#039;ve seen this happen a few times on other sites that i&#039;ve worked on before.  Usually the pages fall off the first page after a few days unless links, traffic, and CTR continue to increase.  

To me, this makes sense for SE&#039;s to do, because it allows more recent/relevant pages to sneak into the first page which probably provides a better user experience (ie. less digging for the user who wants the most recent/relevant results) when these pages would normally take weeks or months to achieve a top 10 ranking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what&#8217;s going on is more of a &#8220;honeymoon period&#8221; where Google ranks new pages/posts high for a short period (possibly based off of how much traffic, clicks, or new links the page is getting) to see if the result is more relevant than current page 1 results.  I&#8217;ve seen this happen a few times on other sites that i&#8217;ve worked on before.  Usually the pages fall off the first page after a few days unless links, traffic, and CTR continue to increase.  </p>
<p>To me, this makes sense for SE&#8217;s to do, because it allows more recent/relevant pages to sneak into the first page which probably provides a better user experience (ie. less digging for the user who wants the most recent/relevant results) when these pages would normally take weeks or months to achieve a top 10 ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giedrius</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/ranking-on-google-for-porn/#comment-5063</link>
		<dc:creator>giedrius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-5063</guid>
		<description>Nothing strange with enough juice in blog and keyword, typically associated with porn. These positions are with safe search turned on, I assume. Most of other sites are 
considered adult ones and unsuitable for showing with safe search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing strange with enough juice in blog and keyword, typically associated with porn. These positions are with safe search turned on, I assume. Most of other sites are<br />
considered adult ones and unsuitable for showing with safe search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

