<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunked: Only The 1st Anchor Text Counts With Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation and Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: car finance</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-23086</link>
		<dc:creator>car finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-23086</guid>
		<description>You maybe onto something. The data looks good. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You maybe onto something. The data looks good. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Einfacher Kreditkarten Vergleich</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>Einfacher Kreditkarten Vergleich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>Yeah,i don&#039;t see this happening. Just wouldn&#039;t make sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,i don&#8217;t see this happening. Just wouldn&#8217;t make sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuantos links cuenta Google desde una pagina hacia otro sitio? &#124; Blog de Presencia en Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-5319</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuantos links cuenta Google desde una pagina hacia otro sitio? &#124; Blog de Presencia en Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-5319</guid>
		<description>[...] David Eaves hizo otro experimento en su propio Blog para verificar lo que Rand Fish decÃ­a sobre que el Ãºnico link que cuenta es el [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Eaves hizo otro experimento en su propio Blog para verificar lo que Rand Fish decÃ­a sobre que el Ãºnico link que cuenta es el [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does The Second Link From A Page Pass Value? &#8211; SEO FAQ &#171; widaca</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4986</link>
		<dc:creator>Does The Second Link From A Page Pass Value? &#8211; SEO FAQ &#171; widaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4986</guid>
		<description>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; rapid-DEV.net</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4946</link>
		<dc:creator>A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; rapid-DEV.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4946</guid>
		<description>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-bunked&#8221; by SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-bunked&#8221; by SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; Misr IT Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4884</link>
		<dc:creator>A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; Misr IT Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4884</guid>
		<description>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion a&amp;#116&amp;#32&amp;#83EOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-bunked&#8221; by SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion a&amp;#116&amp;#32&amp;#83EOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-bunked&#8221; by SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; Today News, Technology, Wordpres</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4882</link>
		<dc:creator>A Geeky Look &#38; Some Simple Solutions To Achieving First Link Priority &#38; Referential Integrity With WordPress (Or Why WordPress SEO Themes Aren&#8217;t) &#124; Today News, Technology, Wordpres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4882</guid>
		<description>[...] mid-2008 th&amp;#101r&amp;#101 wa&amp;#115 continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was deb&amp;#117nked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-&amp;#98&amp;#117nked&#8221; &amp;#98y SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mid-2008 th&amp;#101r&amp;#101 wa&amp;#115 continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was deb&amp;#117nked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-&amp;#98&amp;#117nked&#8221; &amp;#98y SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why WordPress SEO Themes Suck</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>Why WordPress SEO Themes Suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4721</guid>
		<description>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &quot;re-bunked&quot; by SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mid-2008 there was continued discussion at SEOmoz, it was debunked by SEO CO, and &#8220;re-bunked&#8221; by SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does The Second Link From A Page Pass Value? - SEO FAQ : Return on Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Does The Second Link From A Page Pass Value? - SEO FAQ : Return on Investment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Professional SEO, Search Marketing from SEO ROI Services.</title>
		<link>http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Professional SEO, Search Marketing from SEO ROI Services.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/02/debunked-only-the-1st-anchor-text-counts-with-google/#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contributes some original research himself. Other relevant posts come from Rand, Mike van de Mar, Dave Eaves and Michael Martinez. Some partial information was also provided by Matt Cutts to Debra [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

